Market Gains in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 479
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $18,097,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | J And L Whitaker Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $24,539 |
142 | S & A Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $24,539 |
143 | Empire Enterprises Inc | Parkdale, AR 71661 | $24,466 |
144 | Jeff Petty | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $24,449 |
145 | Larry Allen Petty | Monticello, AR 71655 | $24,449 |
146 | Cardinal Farms Ptr | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $24,211 |
147 | Michael Paul Minsky | Eudora, AR 71640 | $24,181 |
148 | J A Smith Tr | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $23,048 |
149 | George E Wilson Jr Pension Plan | Little Rock, AR 72227 | $23,009 |
150 | George E Wilson Jr Md Pa Profit Sharing Plan Trust | Little Rock, AR 72227 | $22,612 |
151 | Blue Tack Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $22,561 |
152 | Jerry V Bailey | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $22,510 |
153 | Pieroni Farm Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $22,473 |
154 | Fred Allen Woodall | Eudora, AR 71640 | $22,397 |
155 | Mabel C Bing | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $21,904 |
156 | Freddy Fortenberry | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $21,083 |
157 | Tommye Fortenberry | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $21,083 |
158 | Lugar Del Pat0 L L C | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $20,924 |
159 | Lta Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $20,826 |
160 | A C Mazzanti | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $20,028 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”