Farm Subsidy information
Chicot County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Chicot County, Arkansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 523
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $34,302,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Matt And Lisa Fortenberry Joint Venture | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $284,453 |
22 | Wgp Farms | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $249,125 |
23 | Poole Farms | Parkdale, AR 71661 | $247,633 |
24 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $231,847 |
25 | Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint Venture | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $224,767 |
26 | Lephiew Farms Partnership | Dermott, AR 71638 | $224,337 |
27 | Barry Brantley Farm LLC | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $220,826 |
28 | Elliott Brothers Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $197,502 |
29 | Belle Partnership | Eudora, AR 71640 | $197,303 |
30 | M & T Farms Partnership | Eudora, AR 71640 | $195,245 |
31 | Arkansas Land & Cattle Co Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $182,941 |
32 | Epstein Land Co | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $179,330 |
33 | Union Bank And Trust Company ** | Monticello, AR 71657 | $176,518 |
34 | Alice Sidney Farms Ltd Partnershi | Dermott, AR 71638 | $175,560 |
35 | Stan Adams Farm Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $175,473 |
36 | A And J Mazzanti Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $174,015 |
37 | Smac Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $173,728 |
38 | Silver Dollar Farms LLC | Eudora, AR 71640 | $171,541 |
39 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $170,867 |
40 | Daniel G Dunavant | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $166,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”