Farm Subsidy information

Chicot County, Arkansas

Total Subsidies in Chicot County, Arkansas, 2019

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 523

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $34,302,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
2019
21Matt And Lisa Fortenberry Joint VentureLake Providence, LA 71254$284,453
22Wgp FarmsWilmot, AR 71676$249,125
23Poole FarmsParkdale, AR 71661$247,633
24Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$231,847
25Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint VentureLake Village, AR 71653$224,767
26Lephiew Farms PartnershipDermott, AR 71638$224,337
27Barry Brantley Farm LLCLake Village, AR 71653$220,826
28Elliott Brothers Farm PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$197,502
29Belle PartnershipEudora, AR 71640$197,303
30M & T Farms PartnershipEudora, AR 71640$195,245
31Arkansas Land & Cattle Co IncLake Village, AR 71653$182,941
32Epstein Land CoLake Village, AR 71653$179,330
33Union Bank And Trust Company **Monticello, AR 71657$176,518
34Alice Sidney Farms Ltd PartnershiDermott, AR 71638$175,560
35Stan Adams Farm IncDermott, AR 71638$175,473
36A And J Mazzanti PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$174,015
37Smac Farm PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$173,728
38Silver Dollar Farms LLCEudora, AR 71640$171,541
39Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$170,867
40Daniel G DunavantLake Village, AR 71653$166,527

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag