Farm Subsidy information
Chicot County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Chicot County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 587
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $17,488,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bank Of Lake Village | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,450,405 |
| 2 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,156,310 |
| 3 | Delta Production Credit Assn ** | Dermott, AR 71638 | $454,166 |
| 4 | Agheritage ** | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $383,411 |
| 5 | Mcgehee Bank Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $315,752 |
| 6 | Steritz Ag | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $301,908 |
| 7 | Poole Farms | Parkdale, AR 71661 | $212,776 |
| 8 | Bill Elliott Jr & Bruce Elliott Ptr | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $177,487 |
| 9 | Elliott Brothers Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $129,709 |
| 10 | Belle Partnership | Eudora, AR 71640 | $128,980 |
| 11 | Matt And Lisa Fortenberry Joint Venture | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $124,952 |
| 12 | Wgp Farms | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $116,805 |
| 13 | Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint Venture | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $108,014 |
| 14 | Bayou Mason Planting Company | Eudora, AR 71640 | $105,340 |
| 15 | Claude And Diane Grubbs Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $104,613 |
| 16 | Ashton Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $104,079 |
| 17 | Commerce Community Bank/wccb ** | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $98,957 |
| 18 | South Ark Farms | Portland, AR 71663 | $98,252 |
| 19 | Will And Kim Grubbs Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $96,396 |
| 20 | Bennett And Son | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $95,247 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf