Total Commodity Programs in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,362

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $422,164,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Yocum FarmsDermott, AR 71638$8,881,087
2Bank Of Lake VillageLake Village, AR 71653$8,484,339
3Bobby Roark & Sons PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$6,395,627
4Simmons 1st National Bank **Lake Village, AR 71653$5,586,367
5Bill Elliott Jr & Bruce Elliott PtrLake Village, AR 71653$5,549,427
6Epstein Land CoLake Village, AR 71653$5,464,296
7Sampolesi FarmsLake Village, AR 71653$3,986,014
8Bennett And SonLake Village, AR 71653$3,947,792
9Ashton General PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$3,786,661
10Poole FarmsParkdale, AR 71661$3,240,121
11B & R FarmsGreenville, MS 38701$3,189,910
12Hensley FarmsEudora, AR 71640$3,127,494
13M & T Farms PartnershipEudora, AR 71640$3,070,611
14Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint VentureLake Village, AR 71653$3,041,784
15Lane FarmsEudora, AR 71640$2,984,113
16Larry And Doreen Pieroni Farm ParLake Village, AR 71653$2,918,958
17Delta Production Credit Assn **Dermott, AR 71638$2,892,329
18B Pieroni FarmsLake Village, AR 71653$2,809,261
19B & B Mencer Farm PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$2,803,006
20A And J Mazzanti PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$2,798,679

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag