Conservation Reserve Program in Clay County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 110
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clay County, Arkansas totaled $332,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Chad Holmes | Rector, AR 72461 | $1,388 |
62 | Brooke Alberson | Piggott, AR 72454 | $1,373 |
63 | Shawn Alberson | Piggott, AR 72454 | $1,373 |
64 | Gregory A Ringler | Wolcottville, IN 46795 | $1,362 |
65 | Billy R Mann | Piggott, AR 72454 | $1,296 |
66 | Lance Koehn | Rector, AR 72461 | $1,280 |
67 | Myra Lea Parks | Rector, AR 72461 | $1,277 |
68 | James M Cooper | Lafe, AR 72436 | $1,267 |
69 | Lloyd Shannon Mann | Carrabelle, FL 32322 | $1,244 |
70 | Virginia Thompson | Rector, AR 72461 | $1,243 |
71 | Gregory Scott Bradshaw | Greenway, AR 72430 | $1,184 |
72 | Michelle Lynn Bradshaw | Greenway, AR 72430 | $1,184 |
73 | Loran Johnson | Pollard, AR 72456 | $1,121 |
74 | Dustin Burns | Rector, AR 72461 | $1,110 |
75 | Darrell D Mccoy | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $1,108 |
76 | Clarence C Kirklin Revocable Trus | Rector, AR 72461 | $1,093 |
77 | Duane Deniston | Kennett, MO 63857 | $1,088 |
78 | Brenda K Presson | Rector, AR 72461 | $994 |
79 | Dennis L Presson | Rector, AR 72461 | $994 |
80 | Eugene Yancey | Rector, AR 72461 | $958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”