Market Gains in Crittenden County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 159
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Crittenden County, Arkansas totaled $8,453,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bruins Partners | Hughes, AR 72348 | $140,042 |
22 | H & H Farms | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $138,650 |
23 | Marconi & Sons | Marion, AR 72364 | $132,966 |
24 | Phil Pirani Farms Inc | Marion, AR 72364 | $128,375 |
25 | Stuckey Farms Company | Clarkedale, AR 72325 | $128,026 |
26 | Williams Planting Co Inc | Marion, AR 72364 | $126,984 |
27 | Brothers Planting Co | Crawfordsville, AR 72327 | $126,593 |
28 | William Bart Turner | Marion, AR 72364 | $122,670 |
29 | Stuckey Farms Inc | Clarkedale, AR 72325 | $121,183 |
30 | C & L Planting Co Inc | Marion, AR 72364 | $120,680 |
31 | Anoka Farms Inc | Hughes, AR 72348 | $113,582 |
32 | Helms Family Farms G P | Clarkedale, AR 72325 | $92,136 |
33 | Fogleman Farms No 2 | Marion, AR 72364 | $91,722 |
34 | Waters Grove Farming Partners | Earle, AR 72331 | $87,853 |
35 | Bobby Cupples Farms Jv | Proctor, AR 72376 | $82,573 |
36 | Seyppel Landing | Hughes, AR 72348 | $71,119 |
37 | A Pirani Partnership | Marion, AR 72364 | $70,659 |
38 | Big Earl Farms | Marion, AR 72364 | $70,539 |
39 | H E Weaver & Son | Edmondson, AR 72332 | $70,223 |
40 | Eva Dan Farms Partnership | Proctor, AR 72376 | $64,744 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”