Total Commodity Programs in Desha County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 572
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Desha County, Arkansas totaled $11,794,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | H D And Carolyn Spainhouer Farms | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $14,595 |
162 | Linn Family Farms LLC | Mcgehee, AR 71654 | $14,554 |
163 | Clifton L Meador Farm | Mountain View, AR 72560 | $14,507 |
164 | C & P Farms Partnership | Tillar, AR 71670 | $14,215 |
165 | Linn Farms Inc | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $14,166 |
166 | Neeley Farms Partnership | Dumas, AR 71639 | $13,954 |
167 | Kbs Company | Dumas, AR 71639 | $13,884 |
168 | Victor And Teresa Coleman Farm Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $13,638 |
169 | Lost Chain Land Company LLC | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $13,373 |
170 | Marty Moncrief | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $13,253 |
171 | Zachary Moreland | Dumas, AR 71639 | $13,154 |
172 | Samantha Sass | Tillar, AR 71670 | $13,093 |
173 | M & M Farming Company | Tillar, AR 71670 | $13,081 |
174 | Elmer Bock Family Trust | Tillar, AR 71670 | $13,069 |
175 | Dumas Plantation LLC | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $12,980 |
176 | Cooke Farms Inc | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $12,868 |
177 | Amanda Adcock Pambianchi Gst Trus | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $12,621 |
178 | Jacob Ayecock | Tillar, AR 71670 | $12,298 |
179 | Chris Anderson | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $12,247 |
180 | Jennifer L Fisher | Dumas, AR 71639 | $12,041 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”