Farm Subsidy information
Desha County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Desha County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,345
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Desha County, Arkansas totaled $554,881,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lee Walt Farms | Dumas, AR 71639 | $2,973,717 |
22 | H D And Carolyn Spainhouer Farms | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $2,699,949 |
23 | Relyance Bank ** | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $2,604,741 |
24 | G & C Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $2,558,639 |
25 | S & E Farms Partnership | Monticello, AR 71655 | $2,486,083 |
26 | Harper Farms Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $2,478,874 |
27 | Sue & Martin Henry Ptrs | Dumas, AR 71639 | $2,415,612 |
28 | Delta Production Credit Assn ** | Dermott, AR 71638 | $2,338,927 |
29 | Baxter Land Co Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $2,327,867 |
30 | Moreland Farms | Dumas, AR 71639 | $2,298,164 |
31 | Raymond Day & Sons | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $2,243,621 |
32 | Nickey Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $2,195,482 |
33 | Bellaire Planting Company | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $2,116,792 |
34 | Arzo Farms Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $2,019,398 |
35 | Agheritage ** | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $2,009,710 |
36 | William H Dunklin Jr | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $1,985,951 |
37 | Don Smith Farms Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $1,983,610 |
38 | Chip Hill Farms | Dumas, AR 71639 | $1,963,885 |
39 | D & S Farms | Tillar, AR 71670 | $1,956,788 |
40 | Lafko Farms Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $1,934,943 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”