Farm Subsidy information
Desha County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Desha County, Arkansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 689
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Desha County, Arkansas totaled $37,664,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Joedd Poyner | Tillar, AR 71670 | $292,493 |
| 22 | Miles Bros Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $277,230 |
| 23 | Sms Planting Company Partnership | Watson, AR 71674 | $272,254 |
| 24 | Larry Linn | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $258,586 |
| 25 | Eastside Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $252,212 |
| 26 | Ll Linn Inc | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $250,844 |
| 27 | D & T Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $244,757 |
| 28 | Colby Linn | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $242,093 |
| 29 | Mankin Farms Inc | Watson, AR 71674 | $235,412 |
| 30 | Baxter Land Co Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $232,387 |
| 31 | Gary Roberts Farms | Dumas, AR 71639 | $225,994 |
| 32 | Don Smith Farms Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $225,503 |
| 33 | Kemp Farms Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $217,292 |
| 34 | R And J Farms Ptrsp | Dumas, AR 71639 | $216,219 |
| 35 | Sue & Martin Henry Ptrs | Dumas, AR 71639 | $211,028 |
| 36 | Palsa Farms | Tillar, AR 71670 | $206,931 |
| 37 | Mark Day Farms Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $204,425 |
| 38 | Malina Tabor Vibhakar | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $199,403 |
| 39 | Guy Teeter Farms | Tillar, AR 71670 | $195,653 |
| 40 | Kemp Land Co Inc | Rohwer, AR 71666 | $195,160 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf