Production Flexibility Program in Desha County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,160
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Desha County, Arkansas totaled $66,329,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mcmahan Farms D And J Ptr | Watson, AR 71674 | $376,406 |
22 | Greenwing Partnership | Monticello, AR 71655 | $373,693 |
23 | J And L Whitaker Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $371,306 |
24 | S & A Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $371,304 |
25 | S & E Farms Partnership | Monticello, AR 71655 | $363,558 |
26 | Bottoms Farm Partnership | Gould, AR 71643 | $359,898 |
27 | H D And Carolyn Spainhouer Farms | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $347,998 |
28 | Guy Teeter Farms | Tillar, AR 71670 | $325,066 |
29 | S And D Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $322,066 |
30 | Harper & Harper Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $318,073 |
31 | T & H Farms Ptr | Dumas, AR 71639 | $312,748 |
32 | Norris Sims & Son | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $311,262 |
33 | A & M Farm Partnership | Tillar, AR 71670 | $294,892 |
34 | Cb Stevens Farms Inc | Tillar, AR 71670 | $288,931 |
35 | Miles Bros Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $288,593 |
36 | Smh Farms Partnership | Dumas, AR 71639 | $278,987 |
37 | Lampkin Farms Inc | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $277,941 |
38 | G And M Farms Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $276,338 |
39 | Cecil Simpson And Son | Tillar, AR 71670 | $273,546 |
40 | Gilliam Farm Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $266,868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”