Total Commodity Programs in Desha County, Arkansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 667
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Desha County, Arkansas totaled $27,526,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | R B Stimson Farms Ptr | Dumas, AR 71639 | $145,340 |
42 | Palsa Farms | Tillar, AR 71670 | $141,366 |
43 | R And J Farms Ptrsp | Dumas, AR 71639 | $141,209 |
44 | Sue & Martin Henry Ptrs | Dumas, AR 71639 | $140,272 |
45 | Kemp Farms Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $132,483 |
46 | William Day & Son Partnership | Tillar, AR 71670 | $131,020 |
47 | Wells Brothers Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $129,976 |
48 | Wells Family Farm | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $128,895 |
49 | D & T Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $127,530 |
50 | Steven Arzo French | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $127,140 |
51 | Peacock & Staudinger Farms | Winchester, AR 71677 | $124,955 |
52 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $124,374 |
53 | Moore Farms Partnership | Dumas, AR 71639 | $123,681 |
54 | Cecil Simpson And Son | Tillar, AR 71670 | $121,994 |
55 | Dana Dwight Giesbrecht | Dumas, AR 71639 | $121,120 |
56 | Moreland Farms | Dumas, AR 71639 | $119,368 |
57 | Charles Pambianchi | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $119,175 |
58 | Mcarthur Planting Co Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $118,476 |
59 | Singleton Farms Partnership | Watson, AR 71674 | $117,335 |
60 | Jefferson Community Farm Inc | Tillar, AR 71670 | $117,215 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”