Market Loss Assistance Program in Drew County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 387
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Drew County, Arkansas totaled $11,726,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | George M Stokes | Dermott, AR 71638 | $127,179 |
22 | Burch & Appleberry Inc | Dumas, AR 71639 | $125,417 |
23 | Prairie Creek Farms Inc | Tillar, AR 71670 | $123,840 |
24 | Mike Mahan | Dermott, AR 71638 | $123,831 |
25 | David Oltmann | Monticello, AR 71655 | $123,582 |
26 | Jerry Pamplin | Monticello, AR 71655 | $119,716 |
27 | Ashley Cockrill Jr Farm Limited Partnership | Tillar, AR 71670 | $118,494 |
28 | Edward A Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $118,163 |
29 | Mahan Farms Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $117,792 |
30 | Nelson Crow | Dumas, AR 71639 | $117,617 |
31 | Red Leaf Farms Inc | Monticello, AR 71655 | $117,270 |
32 | Mike And Tammy Johnson Farms | Tillar, AR 71670 | $115,950 |
33 | Mike Moreland Farms Inc | Dumas, AR 71639 | $114,765 |
34 | Tad Keller | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $114,449 |
35 | Newton & Newton Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $112,995 |
36 | Lawrence Pambianchi | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $111,502 |
37 | Dale Handly | Monticello, AR 71655 | $107,149 |
38 | Coon Bayou Farms LLC | Tillar, AR 71670 | $105,657 |
39 | Ralph Martin Dba W H Byrd Farm | Monticello, AR 71655 | $104,675 |
40 | G & C Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $103,378 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”