Farm Subsidy information
Greene County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Greene County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,013
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Greene County, Arkansas totaled $16,274,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brandon G Martin | Bono, AR 72416 | $54,642 |
42 | Roger Reddick | Paragould, AR 72450 | $54,373 |
43 | Kenneth Newberry | Paragould, AR 72450 | $53,381 |
44 | Debra Newberry | Paragould, AR 72450 | $53,377 |
45 | Jlp Farms | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $51,389 |
46 | Pratt & Pratt Farms L L C | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $49,171 |
47 | Donald E Masters Farms | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $48,424 |
48 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $48,300 |
49 | Randy Gray Farms Partnership | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $47,863 |
50 | Bufford Newberry | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $47,742 |
51 | Conrad D Newberry | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $47,742 |
52 | Dna Farms LLC | Paragould, AR 72450 | $47,640 |
53 | Vicky Felty | Paragould, AR 72450 | $47,603 |
54 | Caleb Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $47,593 |
55 | Rdr Farms Partnership | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $47,561 |
56 | Shane V Mikel | Paragould, AR 72450 | $47,017 |
57 | Natclay Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $46,166 |
58 | Jeremy Newberry | Paragould, AR 72450 | $46,128 |
59 | Shaun Finch | Paragould, AR 72450 | $45,553 |
60 | Amanda Finch | Paragould, AR 72450 | $45,553 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”