Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Greene County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 826
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Greene County, Arkansas totaled $14,574,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jones Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $45,000 |
102 | Staub Realty Co Inc | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $44,399 |
103 | Shaun Finch | Paragould, AR 72450 | $43,388 |
104 | Amanda Finch | Paragould, AR 72450 | $43,387 |
105 | Hamilton Greene Co Farms LLC | Paragould, AR 72451 | $40,335 |
106 | Madison Ann Ezell | Lakeland, LA 70752 | $39,673 |
107 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $39,593 |
108 | Randy Scott Farms Inc | Bono, AR 72416 | $39,436 |
109 | Frankum Limited Partnership | Memphis, TN 38138 | $37,566 |
110 | Arvest Bank ** | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $36,953 |
111 | Wayne Stallcup | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $36,791 |
112 | Blackburn Family Farms LLC | Paragould, AR 72450 | $35,359 |
113 | Stacy Tritch | Paragould, AR 72450 | $34,398 |
114 | Kendra Tritch | Paragould, AR 72450 | $34,398 |
115 | Jerry C Edwards | Paragould, AR 72450 | $34,270 |
116 | Hauck Farms LLC | E Brunswick, NJ 08816 | $33,815 |
117 | C D & D Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $33,322 |
118 | Tmh Farms LLC | Paragould, AR 72450 | $32,643 |
119 | Kory L Randleman | Paragould, AR 72450 | $32,502 |
120 | Terry A Wilkins | Paragould, AR 72450 | $32,140 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”