Farm Subsidy information
Greene County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Greene County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 4,092
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Greene County, Arkansas totaled $500,005,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Carlos Eason | Paragould, AR 72450 | $932,252 |
122 | Starling A White | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $929,628 |
123 | Leslie Russom | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $929,366 |
124 | Grant Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $916,591 |
125 | Pigs Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $916,478 |
126 | James C Rice | Paragould, AR 72450 | $913,634 |
127 | Alexander Plantation Co | Searcy, AR 72143 | $909,848 |
128 | B & P Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $895,265 |
129 | Cathy Rowe | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $894,726 |
130 | J & J Distretti Farm Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $890,178 |
131 | Csmith Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $885,751 |
132 | Jack C French Jr | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $885,176 |
133 | Staub Realty Co Inc | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $874,605 |
134 | Stacey Speer | Marmaduke, AR 72443 | $873,409 |
135 | John W Miles | Paragould, AR 72450 | $871,232 |
136 | Burgess Farms J V | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $868,991 |
137 | James E Ivy Jr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $867,986 |
138 | Gary Dowler | Paragould, AR 72450 | $863,234 |
139 | Eddie Cleveland Etal Ptrs | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $855,485 |
140 | Milburn A Russom | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $854,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”