Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Greene County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 460
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Greene County, Arkansas totaled $6,729,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Graham Farms | Marmaduke, AR 72443 | $392,366 |
2 | King Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $379,243 |
3 | Lhf Partnership | Marmaduke, AR 72443 | $167,011 |
4 | Boyd Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $150,032 |
5 | Promise Land Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $146,704 |
6 | Yates Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $131,264 |
7 | Rdr Farms Partnership | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $126,054 |
8 | Tymac Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $101,942 |
9 | Denise Darlene Boling | Paragould, AR 72450 | $94,611 |
10 | Dave Pratt Farms 26 | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $89,048 |
11 | Jlp Farms | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $79,292 |
12 | Pratt & Pratt Farms L L C | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $72,532 |
13 | Allen & Tenna Griffin Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $71,142 |
14 | Keith Mikel | Paragould, AR 72450 | $71,089 |
15 | Jeremy Newberry | Paragould, AR 72450 | $70,599 |
16 | Kenneth Newberry | Paragould, AR 72450 | $69,348 |
17 | Debra Newberry | Paragould, AR 72450 | $69,338 |
18 | Eric Newberry | Paragould, AR 72450 | $69,272 |
19 | Shane V Mikel | Paragould, AR 72450 | $68,997 |
20 | Keith O Mosbey | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $68,990 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>