Farm Subsidy information
Greene County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Greene County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,994
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Greene County, Arkansas totaled $471,616,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ronald Pigue Jr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,516,002 |
42 | Terry E Smith Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,502,665 |
43 | Caleb Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,498,254 |
44 | Natclay Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,476,321 |
45 | Keith Mikel | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,465,979 |
46 | Charles H Davis Jr | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $1,442,543 |
47 | Douglas Threlkeld | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,438,017 |
48 | D & H Wall Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,422,700 |
49 | C D & D Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,391,083 |
50 | Ronald Wesley Pigue Sr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,369,754 |
51 | Fred R Gates | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $1,367,695 |
52 | Vicky Felty | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,361,366 |
53 | Rdr Farms Ptr | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $1,361,007 |
54 | Diane Russom | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $1,355,060 |
55 | Eason Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,340,414 |
56 | Hendrix Farm Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,326,141 |
57 | Randy Gray Farms Partnership | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $1,311,856 |
58 | K & L Farms Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,311,675 |
59 | Cm & M Farms | Marmaduke, AR 72443 | $1,311,139 |
60 | Ronald Curtis | Marmaduke, AR 72443 | $1,308,622 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”