Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Greene County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,268
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Greene County, Arkansas totaled $89,582,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First National Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72451 | $6,549,733 |
| 2 | King Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $4,160,629 |
| 3 | Bancorp South Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72450 | $2,481,973 |
| 4 | Farm Credit Midsouth Pca ** | Barton, AR 72312 | $1,531,686 |
| 5 | Graham Farms | Marmaduke, AR 72443 | $1,446,458 |
| 6 | Tymac Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,186,626 |
| 7 | Yates Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,091,922 |
| 8 | Boyd Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $986,956 |
| 9 | Martin Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $923,808 |
| 10 | J & T Farms Ptr | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $922,543 |
| 11 | Eason Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $801,406 |
| 12 | Lhf Partnership | Marmaduke, AR 72443 | $639,722 |
| 13 | Allen & Tenna Griffin Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $627,652 |
| 14 | Caleb Farms Inc | Paragould, AR 72450 | $598,195 |
| 15 | Christophe A Russom | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $563,075 |
| 16 | Dave Pratt Farms 26 | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $557,531 |
| 17 | Hendrix Farm Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $556,508 |
| 18 | Joseph Plantation | Paragould, AR 72451 | $555,619 |
| 19 | Merril & Marie Griffin Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $554,207 |
| 20 | Leonard & Steve Wall Farms Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $549,579 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf