Farm Subsidy information
Izard County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Izard County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 272
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Izard County, Arkansas totaled $1,597,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Steve Jones | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $2,219 |
62 | Larry M Shaw | Mount Pleasant, AR 72561 | $2,212 |
63 | S Ryan Howard | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $2,199 |
64 | Susan Jo Hutson | Wiseman, AR 72587 | $2,163 |
65 | Kody Joe Caraway | Mount Pleasant, AR 72561 | $2,112 |
66 | Gregory H Vickery | Sage, AR 72573 | $2,097 |
67 | Larry W Love | Mount Pleasant, AR 72561 | $2,094 |
68 | Noel Booth | Batesville, AR 72501 | $2,075 |
69 | Tate Brothers | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $2,073 |
70 | Debbie Billingsley Yancey | Violet Hill, AR 72584 | $2,052 |
71 | James A Knight | Guion, AR 72540 | $2,041 |
72 | Quentin Houghtaling | Viola, AR 72583 | $2,034 |
73 | Richard Downing | Evening Shade, AR 72532 | $1,998 |
74 | Bruce Knapp | Pineville, AR 72566 | $1,969 |
75 | Doyle Mccollum | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $1,953 |
76 | Kay Cooper | Brockwell, AR 72517 | $1,920 |
77 | Joseph James Ingram | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $1,900 |
78 | Lane Knight Farm LLC | Calico Rock, AR 72519 | $1,881 |
79 | Shane Gardner | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $1,850 |
80 | Hayden Noel Wyatt | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $1,848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”