Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Jackson County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 446
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Jackson County, Arkansas totaled $4,560,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Scott Mears Farm Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $11,037 |
102 | Black River Planting Co LLC | Newport, AR 72112 | $10,812 |
103 | Rowlett Farms LLC | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $10,786 |
104 | Alvous Rowlett Jr | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $10,765 |
105 | Magsuth Inc | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $10,488 |
106 | Jason L Jacobs | Mc Crory, AR 72101 | $10,305 |
107 | James Masek Gift Trust | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $10,294 |
108 | Nancy M Miller Gift Trust | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $10,230 |
109 | Llk Farms Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $10,176 |
110 | 9653, Inc | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $10,125 |
111 | Jj Tinsley Lp | Swifton, AR 72471 | $10,040 |
112 | Krissten Bagwell | Tupelo, AR 72169 | $9,987 |
113 | Tuckerman Land Company Inc | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $9,676 |
114 | Sonny Hutchinson Farms Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $9,638 |
115 | Tommy Lewis | Newport, AR 72112 | $9,568 |
116 | Robert D Gilliaum | Newport, AR 72112 | $9,430 |
117 | Richard Buford | Newport, AR 72112 | $9,370 |
118 | Jamie Buford | Newport, AR 72112 | $9,370 |
119 | Kenneth C Clark | Newport, AR 72112 | $9,282 |
120 | Julia Brand | Newport, AR 72112 | $9,256 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”