Conservation Reserve Program in Jackson County, Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 166
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Jackson County, Arkansas totaled $1,209,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Glover Haigwood Family LLC | Newport, AR 72112 | $3,271 |
102 | Dorthy Epperson | Newport, AR 72112 | $3,136 |
103 | Lois Jean Morgan | Mc Crory, AR 72101 | $3,084 |
104 | William Hamill | Bradford, AR 72020 | $3,023 |
105 | Carl D Sutterfield | Bradford, AR 72020 | $2,897 |
106 | James Monroe Mccartney Family Tru | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,893 |
107 | Hc-mcgaughey Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,676 |
108 | Virginia Pollard | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,535 |
109 | Dorsey & Lewis Jones Farms LLC | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,479 |
110 | Michael L Jones | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,093 |
111 | Lisa Jones | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,093 |
112 | Barbara Clark | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,080 |
113 | Shari Roberts | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,029 |
114 | , | $2,015 | |
115 | Gay Lacy Iv Trust | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,003 |
116 | Julia Elizabeth Lacy Trust | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,003 |
117 | Shirley Cole | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $1,986 |
118 | Dennis And Malcolm Haigwood A Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,938 |
119 | Jean C Boyce | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,752 |
120 | , | $1,689 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”