Total Commodity Programs in Jackson County, Arkansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 687
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Jackson County, Arkansas totaled $30,139,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tri County Farm Ptnrs | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $147,714 |
22 | Barbara Graham | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $145,979 |
23 | Colton Houston Odell | Newport, AR 72112 | $145,049 |
24 | Snmb Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $134,118 |
25 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $133,630 |
26 | Aaron Hulett | Swifton, AR 72471 | $132,007 |
27 | South 7-11 Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $131,910 |
28 | Nmck Farms, Inc. | Newport, AR 72112 | $130,658 |
29 | D L F Limited | Newport, AR 72112 | $128,829 |
30 | K K Farms Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $127,790 |
31 | H & H Planting Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $120,503 |
32 | Snyder Farms Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $120,394 |
33 | Mcgaughey Bros Inc | Fayetteville, AR 72703 | $116,930 |
34 | Bo Buck Incorporated | Newport, AR 72112 | $115,633 |
35 | Rutledge & Rutledge Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $115,501 |
36 | Jj Tinsley Lp | Swifton, AR 72471 | $114,468 |
37 | Jason Clark | Newport, AR 72112 | $114,400 |
38 | A-jac Farms Inc | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $111,465 |
39 | Tami Graham | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $111,454 |
40 | Southbound Farm Partners | Paris, MO 65275 | $111,388 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”