Farm Subsidy information
Jefferson County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Jefferson County, Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 549
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jefferson County, Arkansas totaled $25,268,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Flyway Planting Company LLC | White Hall, AR 71602 | $134,999 |
22 | , | $125,000 | |
23 | Mks Ag Inc | Reydell, AR 72133 | $122,680 |
24 | Jetco Partnership | Wabbaseka, AR 72175 | $122,283 |
25 | Ashcot LLC | Reydell, AR 72133 | $118,687 |
26 | Arkansas Department Of Correction | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $117,881 |
27 | Davmar Farms | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $117,359 |
28 | Kmx Agriculture | Sherrill, AR 72152 | $116,499 |
29 | Sandbar Farming Company | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $116,243 |
30 | Joshua Euseppi | England, AR 72046 | $114,844 |
31 | Big Bayou Meto Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $110,089 |
32 | English Lake Partnership | Tulsa, OK 74137 | $109,283 |
33 | Sandy Loam Farm Inc | Pine Bluff, AR 71603 | $102,544 |
34 | Waterloo Farms | Sherrill, AR 72152 | $97,655 |
35 | Tamo Farms Inc | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $96,597 |
36 | Mathew T. Leek | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $93,478 |
37 | Pipkin Bros Land Co | Sherrill, AR 72152 | $90,385 |
38 | Dayton E Pharr | Monticello, AR 71655 | $80,742 |
39 | Bejay Farms Inc | Little Rock, AR 72211 | $79,892 |
40 | Las Esposas Land Owners | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $78,513 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”