Counter Cyclical Program in Jefferson County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 907
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Jefferson County, Arkansas totaled $44,349,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richland Planting Co | Moscow, AR 71659 | $450,286 |
22 | Harvey & Dean Chambliss Ptr, H & D Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71603 | $439,133 |
23 | J P Walt And Sons | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $410,585 |
24 | R L Box Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $382,079 |
25 | Big Bear Agco | Sherrill, AR 72152 | $380,480 |
26 | F H Lyons Jr | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $380,063 |
27 | F H Lyons III | Sherrill, AR 72152 | $379,052 |
28 | Whitehead Family Farms LLC | England, AR 72046 | $371,125 |
29 | Cottondale Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $350,824 |
30 | The C H Triplett Co | Little Rock, AR 72205 | $341,035 |
31 | Pat H Henderson Farms | England, AR 72046 | $336,122 |
32 | Wildar Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $330,622 |
33 | T-bo Farms Partnership | Cabot, AR 72023 | $326,648 |
34 | Ronny Dean Ptr Farmall Co | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $290,886 |
35 | F G Smart Farming Co | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $289,881 |
36 | Justin D Brown | Star City, AR 71667 | $288,200 |
37 | F And M Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $282,166 |
38 | Trulock Bay Farms | Sherrill, AR 72152 | $280,697 |
39 | Fairfield Farms LLC | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $276,870 |
40 | Walker Jones Farming Co | Pine Bluff, AR 71603 | $276,082 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”