Counter Cyclical Program in Jefferson County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 907
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Jefferson County, Arkansas totaled $44,349,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Arkansas Department Of Correction | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $177,972 |
62 | Freeman Family Farms LLC | Wabbaseka, AR 72175 | $176,657 |
63 | Pharr Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $166,145 |
64 | Ruggeri And Son Farm Inc | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $164,339 |
65 | Dvfarm Group | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $162,002 |
66 | Pecan Lawn Farm Inc | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $161,100 |
67 | Harold Gibbs Farms | Tucker, AR 72168 | $156,300 |
68 | Price Family Farming Company | White Hall, AR 71602 | $153,535 |
69 | W S Jeter Jr | Little Rock, AR 72205 | $152,740 |
70 | J & S Farms | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $151,497 |
71 | F H Lyons Jr & Son Inc | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $151,463 |
72 | S And S Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $145,990 |
73 | J O Bennett And Sons Partnership | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $142,582 |
74 | Jsr And Company | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $141,762 |
75 | Lake Dick Farming Company | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $141,484 |
76 | Peek Farms | England, AR 72046 | $136,476 |
77 | D & N Ward Farms | Quitman, AR 72131 | $136,042 |
78 | Belle Farms | Bainbridge, GA 39819 | $135,798 |
79 | J And M Farms Partnership | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $132,996 |
80 | B N Word Gin Co Inc | Wabbaseka, AR 72175 | $130,273 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”