Production Flexibility Program in Lincoln County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 817
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Lincoln County, Arkansas totaled $39,982,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Chase Farms Inc | Gould, AR 71643 | $238,365 |
42 | David D Gasaway | Dumas, AR 71639 | $237,523 |
43 | Jbf Farm Inc | Dumas, AR 71639 | $236,891 |
44 | Boren Holthoff | Dumas, AR 71639 | $234,402 |
45 | Price Planting Co Inc | Gould, AR 71643 | $230,581 |
46 | K & V Farms Inc | Grady, AR 71644 | $226,789 |
47 | Robertson Bros Farms Inc | Grady, AR 71644 | $224,144 |
48 | Clc Farms Inc | Monticello, AR 71656 | $222,646 |
49 | Jade Farms Inc | Gould, AR 71643 | $222,366 |
50 | Blagg Farms Inc | Dumas, AR 71639 | $220,078 |
51 | Clint Gasaway | Gould, AR 71643 | $219,867 |
52 | Deep Bayou Farms Inc | Star City, AR 71667 | $219,176 |
53 | Benjamin J Fratesi Jr | Star City, AR 71667 | $218,559 |
54 | Keeter Farms Inc | Grady, AR 71644 | $216,447 |
55 | Thomas And Ricky Farms | Dumas, AR 71639 | $214,914 |
56 | Mike Karr | Gould, AR 71643 | $210,718 |
57 | Brewer Bros Farm Inc | Dumas, AR 71639 | $210,052 |
58 | T E Edwards And Sons Ptrsp | Grady, AR 71644 | $208,008 |
59 | H R Wood And Son Inc | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $203,567 |
60 | West And Jarrett Farm Ptrsp | Dumas, AR 71639 | $202,746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”