Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Lincoln County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 102
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Lincoln County, Arkansas totaled $718,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Cleveland Murry | Gould, AR 71643 | $4,800 |
62 | T C Cogbill Jr | Star City, AR 71667 | $4,706 |
63 | Triple T Farm | Grady, AR 71644 | $4,553 |
64 | Calvin Lenderman | Dumas, AR 71639 | $4,420 |
65 | Deep Bayou Farms Inc | Star City, AR 71667 | $4,071 |
66 | Jbf Farm Inc | Dumas, AR 71639 | $4,070 |
67 | Brenda T Mcgathy | Star City, AR 71667 | $4,000 |
68 | Steed Limited Ptrsp Lllp | Star City, AR 71667 | $3,942 |
69 | E F Freeman | Dumas, AR 71639 | $3,857 |
70 | Curtis Marks | Pine Bluff, AR 71603 | $3,804 |
71 | Dewayne Donaldson | Star City, AR 71667 | $3,517 |
72 | Purvis Dunn | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $3,175 |
73 | Roy W Harmon | Star City, AR 71667 | $3,001 |
74 | Ray Leonard | Dumas, AR 71639 | $2,945 |
75 | Wayne Harmon | Star City, AR 71667 | $2,700 |
76 | Ray Wynn | Star City, AR 71667 | $2,699 |
77 | Harry Norris Farms Inc | Gould, AR 71643 | $2,697 |
78 | Rjr Farms | Grady, AR 71644 | $2,683 |
79 | Carolyn Bays | Crossett, AR 71635 | $2,477 |
80 | Harrison Farms Ptrsp | Star City, AR 71667 | $2,280 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”