Counter Cyclical Program in Lincoln County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 750
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Lincoln County, Arkansas totaled $25,539,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gregg Day Ptrsp | Tillar, AR 71670 | $976,556 |
2 | Round Lake Planting Company | Grady, AR 71644 | $790,449 |
3 | Yorktown Planting Company | Yorktown, AR 71678 | $733,621 |
4 | Kenny Price Farming Co | Gould, AR 71643 | $600,692 |
5 | Rjr Farms | Grady, AR 71644 | $564,338 |
6 | Eagle Farm Partnership | Star City, AR 71667 | $508,887 |
7 | Bayou Plantation | Vienna, GA 31092 | $506,764 |
8 | Mcgraw Farms | Gould, AR 71643 | $462,487 |
9 | Jack B Jackson & Sons Ptrsp | Star City, AR 71667 | $457,230 |
10 | G & L Gasaway Farms | Gould, AR 71643 | $423,500 |
11 | B & B Brown Partnership | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $394,498 |
12 | Goodgame Farms Joint Venture | Dumas, AR 71639 | $393,847 |
13 | Don Eifling & Son Farms | Grady, AR 71644 | $386,727 |
14 | Johnson Brothers Ptrsp | Grady, AR 71644 | $370,698 |
15 | Ram Farm Partnership | Dumas, AR 71639 | $366,886 |
16 | Clint Gasaway | Gould, AR 71643 | $347,496 |
17 | Ccr Farms | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $345,735 |
18 | D E & K Farms Ptrsp | Grady, AR 71644 | $336,845 |
19 | J & J Baugh Farms | Star City, AR 71667 | $331,263 |
20 | William L Day Jr | Dumas, AR 71639 | $315,039 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>