Farm Subsidy information
Little River County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Little River County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 764
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Little River County, Arkansas totaled $74,607,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Quincey Jeniece Rayfield | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $37,315 |
202 | Leslie Huddleston | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $37,209 |
203 | E C Lavoice & Sons | Foreman, AR 71836 | $36,612 |
204 | H E Wright Family Lp | Texarkana, TX 75505 | $36,533 |
205 | Bonnie F Grimes | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $35,980 |
206 | Brent Perritt Rayfield | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $35,265 |
207 | Harold Lansdell | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $35,101 |
208 | Roy C Eaton III | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $34,994 |
209 | Jack T Williams II | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $34,692 |
210 | Leigh Atkinson Gage | Foreman, AR 71836 | $34,677 |
211 | Aikman Kendrick | Winthrop, AR 71866 | $34,402 |
212 | Walter A Brown III | Foreman, AR 71836 | $34,016 |
213 | Trey Cobb | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $33,490 |
214 | Paul Hawkins III | Foreman, AR 71836 | $33,412 |
215 | Wayne Gibson | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $33,148 |
216 | Tawnya L. Lansdell | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $33,019 |
217 | Little River Hardwoods | Wilton, AR 71865 | $32,589 |
218 | Gerald L Wisdom | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $32,381 |
219 | Rod Mcelhannon Dba R Mcelhannon | Foreman, AR 71836 | $31,822 |
220 | Vurlon Murray Jr/murray Farms | Haworth, OK 74740 | $31,766 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”