Farm Subsidy information
Little River County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Little River County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 764
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Little River County, Arkansas totaled $74,607,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Rochelle Farms Inc | Nash, TX 75569 | $177,953 |
62 | B & B Planting Of Ashdown LLC | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $177,079 |
63 | Lockwin Ltd | Ruston, LA 71270 | $170,175 |
64 | F Broomfield Dba Broomfield Farms | Foreman, AR 71836 | $170,153 |
65 | Pruet Ranch LLC | Jackson, MS 39201 | $167,260 |
66 | Benjamin Otis Howland | Foreman, AR 71836 | $166,931 |
67 | Grassy Lake Farm LLC | Haworth, OK 74740 | $166,191 |
68 | Gerald Brooks | Winthrop, AR 71866 | $163,138 |
69 | Ford Rochelle | Texarkana, TX 75503 | $160,118 |
70 | Worth L Matteson Iv | De Kalb, TX 75559 | $159,482 |
71 | Grassy Lake Farm | Haworth, OK 74740 | $157,826 |
72 | Ashley Office Systems | Texarkana, TX 75501 | $155,228 |
73 | Danny Daniel | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $154,982 |
74 | Londell Williams | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $153,678 |
75 | Dustin Gene Hughes | Texarkana, TX 75501 | $151,734 |
76 | B & K Cattle Company | Foreman, AR 71836 | $150,372 |
77 | Landon Alan Wade | Texarkana, TX 75501 | $150,121 |
78 | Mickey Seeman | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $149,745 |
79 | Darrell Sain | Foreman, AR 71836 | $145,534 |
80 | Vernon Dean Bowman Sr | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $142,394 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”