Total Commodity Programs in Little River County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 486
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Little River County, Arkansas totaled $31,517,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Matteson Farms | Foreman, AR 71836 | $3,710,642 |
2 | Laynesport Landing Inc | Foreman, AR 71836 | $1,948,726 |
3 | View Point Fr | Foreman, AR 71836 | $1,312,637 |
4 | Matteson Planting Company | Foreman, AR 71836 | $1,169,218 |
5 | J B Davis Farms | Little Rock, AR 72205 | $1,133,901 |
6 | Clark Lavoice & Son | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $763,143 |
7 | View Point Farms LLC | Foreman, AR 71836 | $729,390 |
8 | Paul H Hawkins Farms Inc | Foreman, AR 71836 | $712,124 |
9 | Srt Farms Partnership | Ogden, AR 71953 | $655,553 |
10 | Beverly Matteson Dba Matteson & C | Foreman, AR 71836 | $654,500 |
11 | Cowling Farms | Foreman, AR 71836 | $629,478 |
12 | Jared Seeman Farms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $589,109 |
13 | John H Taaffe | Foreman, AR 71836 | $448,798 |
14 | Abney Farms | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $409,157 |
15 | Eddy Johnston | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $408,420 |
16 | State Bank Of Dekalb | De Kalb, TX 75559 | $402,595 |
17 | Villa Liquor Store Inc Dba Fawcett Ranch | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $384,927 |
18 | Nueces Land & Minerals Limited Pa | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $382,140 |
19 | Charles A Davis Jr | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $327,835 |
20 | Larry Cowling | Foreman, AR 71836 | $308,657 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>