Farm Subsidy information
Logan County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Logan County, Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 149
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Logan County, Arkansas totaled $2,495,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schluterman Farms Incorporated | Paris, AR 72855 | $392,588 |
2 | J & P Willems Farms LLC | Paris, AR 72855 | $135,225 |
3 | Preston Farms LLC | Booneville, AR 72927 | $117,875 |
4 | Brett Foster Cattle Company Inc | Booneville, AR 72927 | $117,875 |
5 | Komp Farms LLC | Subiaco, AR 72865 | $106,677 |
6 | Komp Brothers Farms LLC | Paris, AR 72855 | $100,333 |
7 | Kenneth Corley | Booneville, AR 72927 | $87,575 |
8 | Ouida Ann Whitaker | Booneville, AR 72927 | $62,159 |
9 | Jane M Hattabaugh | Booneville, AR 72927 | $48,976 |
10 | Johnny Balkman | Magazine, AR 72943 | $45,554 |
11 | Jackie D Hewett | Paris, AR 72855 | $38,652 |
12 | C & S Cattle LLC | Paris, AR 72855 | $35,076 |
13 | Laura Ann Staton | Magazine, AR 72943 | $33,493 |
14 | Melvin C Thomas | Magazine, AR 72943 | $28,362 |
15 | Short Mountain Creek Farms LLC | Paris, AR 72855 | $28,041 |
16 | Carl Koch | Paris, AR 72855 | $27,122 |
17 | Larry Sory | Subiaco, AR 72865 | $23,654 |
18 | Casey Cotton | Paris, AR 72855 | $19,639 |
19 | Christopher C Huber | Subiaco, AR 72865 | $18,143 |
20 | Edgar Holt | Booneville, AR 72927 | $17,781 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>