Loan Deficiency in Lonoke County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,159
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Lonoke County, Arkansas totaled $33,441,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jim David Sims Farms Inc | Scott, AR 72142 | $109,668 |
82 | Biggs Planting Co | England, AR 72046 | $108,245 |
83 | Magnum Farms Inc | England, AR 72046 | $107,757 |
84 | Timothy H Turner | England, AR 72046 | $106,668 |
85 | Rice Brothers | England, AR 72046 | $106,493 |
86 | Ricky Branch Farms Inc | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $106,209 |
87 | Walls & Son Inc | Hazen, AR 72064 | $104,503 |
88 | Bobby Gene Wright | Coy, AR 72037 | $103,783 |
89 | W J Bevis & Son Inc | Scott, AR 72142 | $103,656 |
90 | Floyd E Bruce | England, AR 72046 | $102,542 |
91 | Larry Cicero | England, AR 72046 | $102,442 |
92 | Southern Heritage Farm Inc | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $102,015 |
93 | Randy Or Melody Hill Farms | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $101,788 |
94 | Dapat Inc | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $100,081 |
95 | Jacques L Parker | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $99,447 |
96 | Dennis Parker | Beebe, AR 72012 | $99,390 |
97 | George A Smith Farms Inc | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $97,523 |
98 | K & A Sons Farms | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $96,599 |
99 | Mitchell Farms Partnership | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $95,423 |
100 | Cobb Brothers & Co | Keo, AR 72083 | $94,787 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”