Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Lonoke County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 300
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Lonoke County, Arkansas totaled $991,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Martin Underwood Farms | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $703 |
142 | Katherine Ilene Norman Tr Of The Norman Family Tr | Collierville, TN 38017 | $703 |
143 | Fielding Maxwell Norman Tr Of The Norman Family Tr | Collierville, TN 38027 | $703 |
144 | Edith Ann Surrett | England, AR 72046 | $701 |
145 | John E Ball | Scott, AR 72142 | $691 |
146 | Mary Louise Lane | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $688 |
147 | Jane A Benafield | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $675 |
148 | Roy H Smith | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $673 |
149 | Cobb Gin Co | Keo, AR 72083 | $664 |
150 | V & S Investment LLC | Sheridan, AR 72150 | $663 |
151 | William L Evans | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $654 |
152 | Thomas O Murchison Jr | England, AR 72046 | $647 |
153 | Barnes Farm Ptshp | England, AR 72046 | $623 |
154 | Shively Farms LLC | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $615 |
155 | Betty S Smith | England, AR 72046 | $610 |
156 | Michael W Morris | Keo, AR 72083 | $610 |
157 | Martha Morris | Keo, AR 72083 | $610 |
158 | Henry Lonoke Farm | Sherwood, AR 72120 | $606 |
159 | Rice Inter Vivos Real Estate Trust | Conway, AR 72034 | $600 |
160 | Luther F Warner And Nancy D Warne | Burleson, TX 76028 | $595 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”