Farm Subsidy information
Miller County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Miller County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 915
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Miller County, Arkansas totaled $165,129,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | H & H Farms | Fouke, AR 71837 | $588,637 |
42 | Shand Diversified | Haworth, OK 74740 | $573,813 |
43 | Mike Turner | Harrison, AR 72601 | $560,020 |
44 | Mark C Thomas | Houston, TX 77069 | $550,742 |
45 | W V Boyce | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $541,092 |
46 | Robert S Clements | Dallas, TX 75219 | $531,249 |
47 | Josh Davis Dba Josh Davis Farms | Texarkana, TX 75503 | $515,780 |
48 | William E Davis | Texarkana, TX 75505 | $482,963 |
49 | Danny Pickering | New Boston, TX 75570 | $472,262 |
50 | John Turner Jr | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $462,716 |
51 | Mckinney Bayou Farms LLC | Hope, AR 71802 | $452,875 |
52 | Paul Hardy Jr | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $449,798 |
53 | Starks Farms Inc | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $441,108 |
54 | Dibben & Dibben Partnership | Junction City, KS 66441 | $436,792 |
55 | 2 Rivers Farming | Lake City, AR 72437 | $421,497 |
56 | Fort Chadbourne Corp | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $421,110 |
57 | Monroe Scoggins | Fouke, AR 71837 | $411,552 |
58 | Steve And Peggy Groves Family Trust | Garland City, AR 71839 | $403,028 |
59 | Helms Farms | Fouke, AR 71837 | $395,757 |
60 | B & K Barber Family Ltd Ptr | Annona, TX 75550 | $389,721 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”