Farm Subsidy information
Miller County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Miller County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 848
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Miller County, Arkansas totaled $152,034,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Randall K Heigle | Fouke, AR 71837 | $585,454 |
42 | Mike Turner | Harrison, AR 72601 | $560,020 |
43 | Mark C Thomas | Houston, TX 77069 | $550,742 |
44 | Robert S Clements | Dallas, TX 75219 | $531,249 |
45 | Josh Davis Dba Josh Davis Farms | Texarkana, TX 75503 | $503,492 |
46 | W V Boyce | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $488,281 |
47 | William E Davis | Texarkana, TX 75505 | $482,963 |
48 | Shand Diversified | Haworth, OK 74740 | $471,143 |
49 | Mckinney Bayou Farms LLC | Hope, AR 71802 | $444,523 |
50 | Starks Farms Inc | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $441,108 |
51 | Dibben & Dibben Partnership | Junction City, KS 66441 | $436,792 |
52 | 2 Rivers Farming | Lake City, AR 72437 | $421,497 |
53 | Fort Chadbourne Corp | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $421,110 |
54 | Danny Pickering | New Boston, TX 75570 | $415,886 |
55 | Helms Farms | Fouke, AR 71837 | $395,757 |
56 | Monroe Scoggins | Fouke, AR 71837 | $393,609 |
57 | B & K Barber Family Ltd Ptr | Annona, TX 75550 | $389,721 |
58 | Three Lakes Ltd | Texarkana, TX 75503 | $383,271 |
59 | Greg Williams Farms Inc | Bradley, AR 71826 | $382,022 |
60 | Dennis Dougan | Emmet, AR 71835 | $379,967 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”