Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Mississippi County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,531
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi County, Arkansas totaled $900,906,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | S & S Farms | Wilson, AR 72395 | $3,559,217 |
22 | Bancorp South Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72450 | $3,466,070 |
23 | Langston And Elliott | Blytheville, AR 72316 | $3,326,506 |
24 | Hopper & Hopper Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $3,318,844 |
25 | Haynes Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $3,112,656 |
26 | Peyton Speck Farms | Frenchmans Bayou, AR 72338 | $3,102,204 |
27 | Florenden Farms | Burdette, AR 72321 | $3,002,273 |
28 | Wapanocca Farms | Wilson, AR 72395 | $2,986,391 |
29 | C & L Planting Group | Osceola, AR 72370 | $2,984,431 |
30 | David Wildy Farms Ptr | Manila, AR 72442 | $2,880,876 |
31 | C P Farms Partnership | Osceola, AR 72370 | $2,748,313 |
32 | Lwh Farms Inc | Osceola, AR 72370 | $2,743,134 |
33 | Robert L & Dennis Davis Big Lake Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $2,725,903 |
34 | Mccarty Brothers Farms | Osceola, AR 72370 | $2,654,655 |
35 | Senter Land Co Inc | Keiser, AR 72351 | $2,537,080 |
36 | Witt Smith Farms Partnership | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $2,518,815 |
37 | Darrell Brothers Farms Ptr | Luxora, AR 72358 | $2,512,678 |
38 | Fincher Farms Partnership | Dyess, AR 72330 | $2,511,591 |
39 | Todd Edwards Farms | Leachville, AR 72438 | $2,509,599 |
40 | Crosskno Brothers Farms | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $2,509,577 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”