Total Commodity Programs in Phillips County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,574
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Phillips County, Arkansas totaled $493,523,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kenna Farms | Mellwood, AR 72367 | $1,864,348 |
62 | Moon Lake Farms Of Arkansas | Helena, AR 72342 | $1,792,287 |
63 | Jerry Caery Farms | Elaine, AR 72333 | $1,755,317 |
64 | Buron Griffin Farms Inc | Helena, AR 72342 | $1,706,305 |
65 | Swindle Farms | Elaine, AR 72333 | $1,694,868 |
66 | Todd Russell | Turner, AR 72383 | $1,652,887 |
67 | Hillside Farms | Elaine, AR 72333 | $1,633,091 |
68 | Charles R Griffith Farms Inc | Elaine, AR 72333 | $1,629,959 |
69 | E And B Hindsley Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $1,605,842 |
70 | Rial Farms | Lexa, AR 72355 | $1,601,282 |
71 | D And C Warren Farms | Lambrook, AR 72353 | $1,595,403 |
72 | Brian Stoner Farms | West Helena, AR 72390 | $1,595,299 |
73 | J H Quinn III Farms | Elaine, AR 72333 | $1,564,892 |
74 | Chris And Tasha Warren Farms | Lambrook, AR 72353 | $1,532,911 |
75 | Van Dawson Farms Partnership | Lexa, AR 72355 | $1,528,528 |
76 | Green Leaf Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $1,465,783 |
77 | Jkl Farms Inc | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $1,430,644 |
78 | Pitt Moore Farms J V | West Helena, AR 72390 | $1,429,743 |
79 | A & M Farms | Lambrook, AR 72353 | $1,426,123 |
80 | Coffee Creek Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $1,405,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”