Total Conservation Programs in Phillips County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 242
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Phillips County, Arkansas totaled $7,014,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | John Tolar | Poplar Grove, AR 72374 | $16,533 |
82 | Christopher Warren | Lambrook, AR 72353 | $16,414 |
83 | Dusty W Patton | West Helena, AR 72390 | $16,245 |
84 | Thompson's Hill Limited Partnership | Marvell, AR 72366 | $15,859 |
85 | Mary Case Crisp | Marvell, AR 72366 | $15,850 |
86 | Ross Hindsley & Son Inc | Marvell, AR 72366 | $15,723 |
87 | Theresa Caldwell | Bossier City, LA 71112 | $15,625 |
88 | E Hogg Jackson Properties LLC | Lexa, AR 72355 | $15,624 |
89 | L & B Farms Inc | Elaine, AR 72333 | $14,000 |
90 | Roy L Helton Jr | Lexa, AR 72355 | $13,776 |
91 | Phillips Co | Helena, AR 72342 | $13,134 |
92 | Blanche L Choate | Hot Springs, AR 71901 | $12,842 |
93 | Cox Brothers | Holly Grove, AR 72069 | $12,839 |
94 | Harriet Stanford | Hollywood, FL 33021 | $12,808 |
95 | Pitt Moore Farms J V | West Helena, AR 72390 | $12,407 |
96 | E & S Bartlett Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $12,083 |
97 | Clark M Hall | Marvell, AR 72366 | $11,725 |
98 | Jopaneca Corp | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $11,662 |
99 | Blake Culp | Marvell, AR 72366 | $11,304 |
100 | Haywire Farms | Wabash, AR 72389 | $11,073 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”