Farm Subsidy information
Prairie County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Prairie County, Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 605
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Prairie County, Arkansas totaled $11,790,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Frank A Lisko | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $43,318 |
42 | James William Hahn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $42,059 |
43 | Kelli Bell Morton | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $41,364 |
44 | Charles And Wendi Stock | Hazen, AR 72064 | $41,197 |
45 | Pearl Ogp LLC | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $41,103 |
46 | Vicki Marek | Hazen, AR 72064 | $39,950 |
47 | Amy Marek | Hazen, AR 72064 | $39,950 |
48 | Jason S Cox | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $39,389 |
49 | E L Hall Farm Inc | Little Rock, AR 72223 | $38,895 |
50 | Dwight Holloway | Griffithville, AR 72060 | $38,534 |
51 | R & S Skarda Farms Partnership | Hazen, AR 72064 | $38,310 |
52 | Buckskin Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $37,094 |
53 | Mark Marek | Hazen, AR 72064 | $36,638 |
54 | Jeff Marek | Hazen, AR 72064 | $36,638 |
55 | Donald Morton Jr | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $36,154 |
56 | Brian Madar | Beebe, AR 72012 | $34,825 |
57 | Bryan R Felty | Hazen, AR 72064 | $33,575 |
58 | Mason Sickel | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $33,171 |
59 | Andrew Sickel | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $33,171 |
60 | Courtney L Kee | Hazen, AR 72064 | $32,528 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”