Oilseed Program in Prairie County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 838
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Prairie County, Arkansas totaled $2,289,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Martin S Eades | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $8,635 |
62 | Johnnie Longnecker Jr | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $8,548 |
63 | Gene B Tull | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $8,405 |
64 | Alan Sickel | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $8,379 |
65 | Michael Longnecker | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $8,344 |
66 | Gloria Strohl Revocable Trust | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $8,220 |
67 | Melvin Frank Hula Jr | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $8,073 |
68 | Henry C Strohl Revocable Trust | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $8,038 |
69 | Timmy Baxter | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $7,982 |
70 | Gary W Madar | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $7,947 |
71 | Timothy R Bednar | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,807 |
72 | George S Ford Rev Trust | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $7,740 |
73 | Sharon S Dicks Morton | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $7,723 |
74 | Kent Smith | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $7,688 |
75 | Karen Smith | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $7,688 |
76 | Kelly Sanner | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $7,597 |
77 | Tommy Schwede | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $7,542 |
78 | Jon Kelly Konecny | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,529 |
79 | Agrah Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,514 |
80 | Luebker Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,448 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”