Loan Deficiency in Prairie County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 946
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Prairie County, Arkansas totaled $20,298,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mike Livesay & Rhonda Livesay | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $73,302 |
82 | Kent Smith | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $72,976 |
83 | Karen Smith | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $72,618 |
84 | Deborah Fay Jones | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $71,311 |
85 | Frank Jones | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $71,311 |
86 | Ken Hall Farms Inc | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $70,611 |
87 | Triple D Farm Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $69,871 |
88 | Phil Petrus Farms Inc | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $69,350 |
89 | John E Garrich III | Hazen, AR 72064 | $68,332 |
90 | Robin Kirkland | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $67,365 |
91 | Robert Petrus Revocable Trust | Hazen, AR 72064 | $66,598 |
92 | Billy Wayne Holland | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $66,505 |
93 | Eva Lou Harris | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $66,298 |
94 | M & H Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $61,969 |
95 | Ray Harvey | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $61,233 |
96 | Carl Edward Walters | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $60,832 |
97 | Sue Ann Petrus | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $60,666 |
98 | Charles J Shumate | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $60,000 |
99 | Everett Adams Jr | Hazen, AR 72064 | $59,818 |
100 | Kelly Sanner | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $58,746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”