Counter Cyclical Program in Prairie County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,071
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Prairie County, Arkansas totaled $12,465,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Alan Sickel | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $70,688 |
22 | Jerrod Wade Holloway | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $70,664 |
23 | Stovesand Farms Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $68,896 |
24 | David And Patricia Feilke Farm | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $66,793 |
25 | Double B Planting Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $62,204 |
26 | Bobby Chesser | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $61,973 |
27 | Lisko Farms Inc | Hazen, AR 72064 | $61,353 |
28 | Agrah Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $59,504 |
29 | Lynn Sickel | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $59,280 |
30 | Kent Smith | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $59,270 |
31 | Karen Smith | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $59,265 |
32 | Richard Lisko | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $57,149 |
33 | Graham & Sons | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $54,802 |
34 | Roger Crowe Farms Inc | Little Rock, AR 72223 | $54,048 |
35 | Eddie Mcmullen | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $51,748 |
36 | Tommy Schwede | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $51,244 |
37 | S & E Farms Inc | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $51,171 |
38 | Rick Branham | Austin, AR 72007 | $50,484 |
39 | Tim Devore | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $50,240 |
40 | Mike Livesay & Rhonda Livesay | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $50,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”