Deficiency Payment in Prairie County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 898
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Prairie County, Arkansas totaled $19,664,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 7-11 Farm Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $286,887 |
2 | Caviness Farm | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $212,240 |
3 | Oliver Farms Tommy Ray | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $207,251 |
4 | Toll Farms | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $199,130 |
5 | Trust Operations Ptns | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $197,504 |
6 | Hardke & Sons Fred L | Hazen, AR 72064 | $192,736 |
7 | Calhoun & Son Farms Floyd | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $191,782 |
8 | Tate Brothers | Griffithville, AR 72060 | $179,848 |
9 | David And Patricia Feilke Farm | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $179,596 |
10 | Simmons & Son | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $157,170 |
11 | Greenwalt Company | Hazen, AR 72064 | $153,744 |
12 | Triple P Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $149,645 |
13 | Seidenstricker Farms | Hazen, AR 72064 | $147,048 |
14 | Ciganek Bros | Hazen, AR 72064 | $127,258 |
15 | Bell & Bell Farms | Hickory Plains, AR 72066 | $126,308 |
16 | Chantel Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $113,926 |
17 | Meiner Brothers | Hazen, AR 72064 | $112,000 |
18 | Newkirk Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $106,075 |
19 | Makovec Bros Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $98,392 |
20 | Triple D Farms LLC | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $96,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>