Direct Payment Program in Prairie County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,520
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Prairie County, Arkansas totaled $105,779,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Toll Farms | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $2,073,381 |
2 | Corner Stone Ptns | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $1,470,865 |
3 | Greenwalt Company | Hazen, AR 72064 | $1,311,954 |
4 | Seidenstricker Farms | Hazen, AR 72064 | $1,311,312 |
5 | Caviness Farm | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $1,169,984 |
6 | Nail Brothers | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $1,150,805 |
7 | 7-11 Farm Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $1,103,847 |
8 | Calhoun & Son Farms Floyd | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $1,071,626 |
9 | Trust Operations Ptns | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $974,986 |
10 | Hardke Farms | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $945,909 |
11 | Cedar Corner Farm | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $932,130 |
12 | Oliver Farms Tommy Ray | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $906,163 |
13 | Simmons & Son | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $838,486 |
14 | Tate Farms | Griffithville, AR 72060 | $801,363 |
15 | Kerksieck Brothers Farm | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $755,863 |
16 | Ciganek Bros | Hazen, AR 72064 | $697,488 |
17 | R & S Skarda Farms Partnership | Hazen, AR 72064 | $673,752 |
18 | Benchmark Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $645,698 |
19 | Agrah Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $587,366 |
20 | Mitchell Farms Partnership | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $583,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>