Production Flexibility Program in Prairie County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,311
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Prairie County, Arkansas totaled $66,203,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Toll Farms | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $963,396 |
2 | 7-11 Farm Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $854,478 |
3 | Caviness Farm | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $810,964 |
4 | Greenwalt Company | Hazen, AR 72064 | $688,861 |
5 | Trust Operations Ptns | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $663,969 |
6 | Oliver Farms Tommy Ray | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $644,150 |
7 | Calhoun & Son Farms Floyd | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $615,046 |
8 | Seidenstricker Farms | Hazen, AR 72064 | $550,221 |
9 | Triple P Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $541,476 |
10 | Tate Brothers | Griffithville, AR 72060 | $513,646 |
11 | Simmons & Son | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $483,968 |
12 | Ciganek Bros | Hazen, AR 72064 | $442,976 |
13 | Triple S & H Farms | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $440,406 |
14 | David And Patricia Feilke Farm | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $432,782 |
15 | Chantel Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $411,825 |
16 | Stovesand Farms Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $408,440 |
17 | Hardke & Sons Fred L | Hazen, AR 72064 | $399,751 |
18 | Bell Farming Company | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $395,840 |
19 | Nail Brothers | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $383,094 |
20 | Hardke Farms | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $359,560 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>