Total Commodity Programs in Prairie County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,509
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Prairie County, Arkansas totaled $387,679,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farmers & Merchants Bank ** | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,933,319 |
2 | Toll Farms | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $7,315,336 |
3 | Greenwalt Company | Hazen, AR 72064 | $4,780,252 |
4 | Agheritage ** | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $4,354,368 |
5 | Seidenstricker Farms | Hazen, AR 72064 | $3,903,328 |
6 | Nail Brothers | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $3,747,497 |
7 | Corner Stone Ptns | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $3,574,005 |
8 | Calhoun & Son Farms Floyd | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $3,409,738 |
9 | Caviness Farm | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $3,259,925 |
10 | 7-11 Farm Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $3,051,310 |
11 | Bancorp South Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72450 | $2,932,250 |
12 | Oliver Farms Tommy Ray | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $2,858,481 |
13 | Cedar Corner Farm | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $2,764,797 |
14 | Simmons & Son | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $2,630,498 |
15 | Hardke Farms | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $2,622,190 |
16 | Trust Operations Ptns | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $2,613,244 |
17 | Mitchell Farms Partnership | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $2,373,778 |
18 | Ciganek Bros | Hazen, AR 72064 | $2,164,960 |
19 | Caviness Farms II | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $2,151,259 |
20 | Triple P Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $1,911,618 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>