Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Randolph County, Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 368
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Randolph County, Arkansas totaled $527,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Davis Cattle Partnership | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $11,931 |
2 | Travis Tweedy Dba Tweedy Cattle Co | Imboden, AR 72434 | $11,397 |
3 | Wall Farms LLC | Ravenden Springs, AR 72460 | $10,253 |
4 | Wsj Farms | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $10,185 |
5 | Mike Layton | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $9,775 |
6 | Bobby D Courtney | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $9,632 |
7 | Bjg Cattle Co LLC | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $7,723 |
8 | Middlebrook Ranch Ptr New | Maynard, AR 72444 | $7,720 |
9 | Calvin W Botard | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $7,556 |
10 | , | $6,867 | |
11 | Charles Parker Johnson | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $6,847 |
12 | Shane Wells | Imboden, AR 72434 | $6,758 |
13 | Christophe D Amick | Warm Springs, AR 72478 | $6,695 |
14 | Terry L Redwine | Maynard, AR 72444 | $5,854 |
15 | , | $5,456 | |
16 | Randolph Land & Cattle Inc | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $5,275 |
17 | Tommie Mann | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $5,128 |
18 | Dennis Lamberth | Ravenden, AR 72459 | $5,054 |
19 | Thornton A Tweedy | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $4,879 |
20 | Karen Oxborrow | Ravenden Springs, AR 72460 | $4,804 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>