Production Flexibility Program in Randolph County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 543
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Randolph County, Arkansas totaled $22,982,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Farm Joint Venture | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $1,029,611 |
| 2 | Crisler Farms | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $802,764 |
| 3 | Steimel Joint Venture | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $788,172 |
| 4 | Bbg Farms | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $742,988 |
| 5 | Wren Farm Joint Venture | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $681,105 |
| 6 | Morris Frms Jv No-good Id | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $593,396 |
| 7 | John D Bennett Farms Jt Venture | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $525,437 |
| 8 | Ellis Farms Ptr New | Maynard, AR 72444 | $515,894 |
| 9 | Lamb Brothers | Biggers, AR 72413 | $464,940 |
| 10 | Lancet-lamb Farms Joint Venture | Reyno, AR 72462 | $418,488 |
| 11 | Sullivan Farm Partnership | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $392,736 |
| 12 | Bibb Farms Partnership | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $368,322 |
| 13 | Johnson Farms Partners | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $363,896 |
| 14 | Weitkamp Farms Partnership | O Kean, AR 72449 | $351,629 |
| 15 | Throesch Farms Ptr New | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $341,664 |
| 16 | Liebhaber Bros | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $321,839 |
| 17 | Lemmons & Son | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $314,452 |
| 18 | Thielemier Farms Joint Venture | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $308,757 |
| 19 | Bsb Joint Venture | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $301,722 |
| 20 | Hurst Bros | Maynard, AR 72444 | $287,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
