Farm Subsidy information
Saint Francis County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 392
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $10,505,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | L'anguille Club LLC | Marion, AR 72364 | $50,710 |
22 | Circle S Farms | Heth, AR 72346 | $49,640 |
23 | Forrwin Farms Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $49,498 |
24 | Farm Credit Midsouth Pca ** | Barton, AR 72312 | $49,378 |
25 | , | $49,277 | |
26 | John Horton | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $44,837 |
27 | Alvertis Gatlin | Palestine, AR 72372 | $40,349 |
28 | Heritage Farms Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $39,932 |
29 | Delta Ag Partners | Hughes, AR 72348 | $39,389 |
30 | June Ivy LLC | Marion, AR 72364 | $34,705 |
31 | Signature Bank Of Arkansas Bank ** | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $31,948 |
32 | R & J Farm | Hunter, AR 72074 | $30,822 |
33 | Wright Land Co Inc | Widener, AR 72394 | $30,130 |
34 | Roberts Management Co Inc | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $28,638 |
35 | Otis L Smith Sr | Goodwin, AR 72340 | $28,024 |
36 | Smith Ark Farms 03 | Jonesboro, AR 72401 | $27,436 |
37 | , | $27,380 | |
38 | Shirley A. Mckissick | Palestine, AR 72372 | $27,288 |
39 | Mulberry Planting Company | Palestine, AR 72372 | $26,921 |
40 | Shell Lake Farms Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $26,327 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”